- Future Students
- Current Students
- Programs
- Programs of Study
- Undergraduate Studies
- Bachelor of General Studies
- Bachelor of Education as a Second Degree
- Minors
- Counselling and Human Development Minor
- Curriculum and Instruction Minor
- Early Learning Minor
- Educational Psychology Minor
- Learning and Developmental Disabilities Minor
- Social Justice in Education Minor
- Elementary Generalist Minor
- Environmental Education Minor
- French Education Minor
- Physical and Health Education Minor
- Secondary Mathematics Education Minor
- Secondary Teaching Minor
- Certificates
- Courses
- Teacher Education
- Professional Diplomas
- Graduate Studies
- Masters Programs
- MA, MEd in Arts Education
- MA, MEd in Counselling Psychology
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Children’s and Young Adult Literature
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Contemplative Inquiry & Approaches in Education
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Ecological Education
- MA, MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Educational Theory and Practice
- M.Éd. dans Curriculum & Instruction: Enseigner et apprendre en français: plurilinguismes, francophonies et éducation
- MA, MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Equity Studies in Education
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Imagination in Teaching, Schooling and Place
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Innovations in Mathematics Education
- MA, MEd dans Curriculum & Instruction: l'éducation en français en contextes de diversité (campus de SFU)
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Place- and Nature-Based Experiential Learning
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Post-Secondary (VCC)
- MEd in Curriculum & Instruction: Science Education and Communication
- MEd in Educational Leadership: Post-Secondary (Surrey)
- MEd in Educational Leadership: Imaginative K-12 Leadership (Surrey)
- MEd in Educational Practice
- MEd in Educational Practice: Indigenous Pedagogy and Indigenous Inquiry
- MEd in Educational Practice: Practitioner Inquiry
- MA, MEd in Educational Psychology
- MEd in Teaching Languages in Global Contexts
- MA, MEd in Educational Technology & Learning Design
- MSc, MEd in Secondary Mathematics Education
- MA, MEd in Teaching English as an Additional Language
- Doctoral Programs
- EdD in Educational Leadership: Leading for Educational Change in the Yukon
- PhD in Arts Education
- PhD in Educational Psychology
- PhD in Educational Technology & Learning Design
- PhD in Educational Theory and Practice: Curriculum and Pedagogy Stream
- PhD in Educational Theory and Practice: Philosophy of Education Stream
- PhD in Languages, Cultures and Literacies
- PhD en langues, cultures et littératies (en français)
- PhD in Mathematics Education
- Areas of Study
- Program Comparision
- Masters Programs
- Programs in French
- Faculty & Research
- Indigeneity
- Community
- About
- News & Events
- Support Us
- Instructor & Staff Resources
- Work With Us
- Contact
News
New system improves learning
Three teachers at Barriere Elementary School began using vertical non-permanent learning surfaces last year. Now seven are using them.
“I went to a presentation by Peter Liljedahl on how to use them,” BES teacher Bruce Boulter told School District 73 trustees during a board meeting held Oct. 2 at the school. “I changed my classroom the next day.”
READ MORE: District confident despite challenges heading into new school year
Fellow teacher Louise Dunston said she uses vertical learning surfaces to teach not just math but also English.
“It’s amazing to see the change. The students learn how to communicate,” she said.
Vertical learning surfaces means the students do their work on whiteboards that have been mounted on the classroom walls, rather than at their desks.
The approach was developed by Peter Liljedahl, a professor at Simon Fraser University.
Students work in teams of two or three that are chosen randomly and changed regularly, usually every day.
There is only marker per team and the person with the marker can only write down what someone else tells him or her.
Because the markers are non-permanent, the students have a greater willingness to take and stay on task that is measurable
Observed benefits include improved engagement and enthusiasm, and increased communication amongst the students.
The approach encourages struggling learners to collaborate and learn from their peers (no more hiding at their desk), as well as allowing more opportunities for assessment.
Boulter told the story of two boys in one of his math classes – one a high math achiever, the other with much lower skills.
The high achiever appeared dismayed when he found out he was going to be teamed with the other.
Both of them needed to collaborate to solve the problem, however, and so the first one carefully explained what the second needed to know.
All of a sudden the second was shouting out, “Yes, I get it! Yes, I get it! Today, I learned Grade 7 math!”
Boulter thought the breakthrough was so important that the following day he told the second boy’s home-room teacher abut it – only to find he already knew.
The other students in the class had also thought it important and had told the home-room teacher earlier that morning.
The episode greatly helped the self-esteem of both boys, Boulter felt.
Dunston said she sometimes runs out of room on the whiteboards and so uses the windows in her classroom (with non-permanent markers, of course).
The students progress noticeably more quickly through the course material using this system, she said.
“It’s changed how I teach. It’s a good tool,” Dunston said.
School board chair Meghan Wade observed that her daughter is studying mechanical engineering at Queens University.
There, the students need to solve problems in their exams both as a team and as individuals.
Their final score is the average of the two marks – which means that being able to collaborate is just as important as individual learning.