NEW APPLICATIONS
Applications that involve only SFU team members are submitted and managed in the SFU system called 'Kuali Protocols' (Note: various emails and prompts from the system will come from non-SFU addresses.)
Training videos and quick guides
Quick guides and in-depth training videos are now available to assist the following user groups:
Please visit our FAQ page for more information about the system
NOTE: SFU students are not eligible to be a Principal Investigator. The student's Supervisor is accountable for oversight of the research and must be listed as the Principal Investigator. The ethics application, recruiting materials, and consent documents must state that the research is being conduct by a student and for the purposes of a Master's or Doctoral thesis.
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PROJECTS (BC collaborators)
If the project involves collaborators within BC, the application may be eligible to proceed through the harmonized review model (used by most BC universities and colleges and all health authorities) which allows researchers to submit a single ethics application - https://healthresearchbc.ca/research-ethics-bc/info-and-resources/information-for-researchers/. You will be required to access the 'PREP' system which is hosted by UBC's RISe system. You will need to create a UBC CWL account - https://www.rise.ubc.ca/
PROJECTS ALREADY APPROVED BY A CANADIAN REB FROM OUTSIDE OF BC
If a research project already has approval from an external REB (outside of the province of BC) and a SFU collaborator is involved, the SFU collaborator must submit a 'previously approved by a TCPS2 compliant organization' through the SFU Kuali system and upload the following documentation: a copy of the approved research ethics application form and documentation, a copy of the research ethics approval, and a summary of activities taking place at SFU.
If you would like to recruit participants from SFU and a SFU collaborator is not involved in your project, please contact the REB for review and approval via email with the following documentation: a copy of the approved research ethics application form and documentation, a copy of the research ethics approval, and a summary of activities taking place at SFU. The REB will review the application as per the applicable process.
NOTE: The SFU REB reserves the right to deny a request from an external researcher to conduct research at SFU, and the institution is under no obligation to facilitate the project in any way, including assisting with participant recruitment.
2025 REB MEETINGS AND SUBMISSION DEADLINES
There are no deadlines for minimal risk applications, but deadlines for submission to the full board meetings are strictly observed. Submissions must be deemed of sufficient quality to be placed on the meeting agenda. REB meetings are not held in August or December.
|
Month/day |
Submission Deadline |
|
January 15 |
December 17, 2024 |
|
February 12 |
January 21 |
|
March 12 |
February 18 |
|
April 9 |
March 18 |
|
May 14 |
April 15 |
|
June 11 |
May 20 |
|
July 9 |
June 17 |
|
September 17 |
August 19 |
|
October 8 |
September 16 |
|
November 12 |
October 21 |
POST APPROVAL ACTIVITIES
Once initial approval is issued, post-approval activities (PAAs) can be submitted to make changes to the project, to renew the project on an annual basis, to report an unexpected event or to request an acknowledgement, or to close the application. Amendments to the study must be submitted and approved PRIOR to the changes being implemented except where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to participants.
REVIEW PROCESS AND TIMELINES
Research ethics review is a multi-step and ongoing process. Review turnaround times (for initial submissions, resubmissions, amendments, and renewals) may vary due to a variety of factors such as the quality of the submission, availability of reviewers, the volume of applications submitted, the level of risk associated with the research project, and the complexity of the application.
A project will be reviewed only when it has been determined that the information and materials submitted are sufficient to enable an informed review of the ethical acceptability of the research. Should information and materials be deemed insufficient, the application will be returned to the researcher for revisions.
It is not possible to guarantee review turnaround times or accommodate requests for urgent reviews except in exceptional circumstances (i.e., unforeseen circumstances that arise under a research protocol that require immediate consideration). Exceptional circumstances do not include research deadlines or timelines known well in advance (e.g., course timelines).
It is the Principal Investigator’s responsibility to ensure that the research team can meet any time sensitive deadlines (e.g., conducting research at an event that is scheduled in advance) and that projects are feasible to complete within restricted timeframes (e.g., course-based research projects).
Please only follow up with status enquiries once the timelines below have expired.
Initial Review
Minimal Risk projects – 20-25 business days (*if minimal risk projects are referred to the Full Board or require additional expertise to assist with the review, the turnaround time will increase).
Above Minimal Risk projects – the turnaround time will substantially increase as these studies are reviewed at scheduled Full Board meetings. Allow at least 14 days from the date of the meeting at which the project is reviewed to receive a response. ABOVE MINIMAL RISK PROJECTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE SUBMISSION DEADLINE AND MUST BE DEEMED OF SUFFICIENT QUALITY TO BE PLACED ON THE MEETING AGENDA.
Post Approval Activities
Amendments – 15-20 business days
Annual renewals – 15-20 business days. The Kuali system sends out automated reminders 60 days, 45 days and 30 days ahead of the current approval's expiry date. It is expected that the Principal Investigator will respond to this notice in a timely fashion and well ahead of the approval expiry date either by submitting an application for renewal or by notifying the REB of the closure of the study.