Spatial Statistical Analysis:
Spatial Autocorrelation

 

Moran and Geary Indices

Moran's I is a spatial autocorrelation measure for variables with interval and ratio scales. Spatial autocorrelation refers to the relationship among values of a variable attributable to the way that the corresponding areal units are ordered in space. Positive spatial autocorrelation means that adjacent areal units have similar values or characteristics, negative spatial autocorrelation means that nearby areal units have dissimilar values or characteristics, and finally, no spatial autocorrelation means that there is no particular systematic structure on how the pattern is formed (i.e. the pattern is close to a random pattern).

The value of Moran's I ranges from -1 for negative spatial
autocorrelation to +1 for positive spatial autocorrelation. If no spatial autocorrelation exists, the expected value of Moran's I is Ei = -1/(n-1).

Geary's Ratio compares the neighbouring values with the each other directly to measure how dissimilar the two values are. The value of this ratio ranges from 0 for perfect positive spatial autocorrelation to 2 for perfect negative spatial autocorrelation. In contrast to Moran's I, the expected value of the Geary Ratio is not affected by sample size n but is always 1, indicating no spatial autocorrelation.

Seven variables that are presumed to correlate with TB occurrences in EAs are selected to calculate Moran and Geary Indices; however, there are also many ordinal and interval variables in the data set that can be used. Ideally, all suitable variables should be selected to conduct the calculation, but due to the large amount of variables in the data set, only those that are considered important are selected.

In the attached tables, all the seven variables chosen have positive spatial autocorrelation under both matrices because the observed Moran's I is greater than the expected Moran's I. The z-scores under normal and randomised assumptions are both larger than 1.96, so it can be concluded that there is significant positive spatial autocorrelation amongst the seven variables among the Eas. The Geary's Ratio also yields consistent results with the Moran's I - average number of bedrooms has the highest positive spatial autocorrelation because its Geary's Ratio is closest to zero under both matrices. Nevertheless, for the binary connectivity matrix, the number of females using public transit ranks second in terms of spatial autocorrelation for Moran's I but average for Geary's Ratio, average 1995 income has the second most spatial autocorrelation. For the stochastic matrix, both the Moran's I and Geary Ratio indicates that average 1995 income as the variable that has the second highest degree of spatial autocorrelation among the EAs containing TB cases.


Local Indicators of Spatial Autocorrelation

Statistics focused on the local level are important because the magnitude of spatial autocorrelation is not necessarily uniform over the study area. Spatial heterogeneity can cause positive spatial autocorrelation in one part of the region and negative spatial autocorrelation in another part.

To indicate the level of spatial autocorrelation at the local scale, the local Moran statistic is derived for each Enumeration Area (EA) that has contains observations of active tuberculosis incidence. The local Moran's I reflects how neighbouring values are associated with each other - a high value of local Moran indicates a clustering of dissimilar values and a low value of local Moran indicates a clustering of similar values.

In the map image below, clustering of similar values is identified in the Downtown Eastside and Downtown Vancouver, as shown in red. Most of the EAs in the study area tend to have similar counts of TB cases with their neighbouring EAs. A minority of EAs has a negative Local Moran's I, as shown in blue, and their low value of Local Moran indicates a clustering of dissimilar TB counts.


A Map of the study area (with an inset of GVRD) showing the Local Moran's I for each EA with TB Cases

Previous - Next


Methodology & Analysis
Visualization | Demographic Profiling | MCE | Spatial Statistics [ 1 2 3 4]


Home | Introduction | Background
Objectives | Data | Analysis | Error | Conclusions
Links | References | Contact