- About
- People
- What We Do
- Consulting Services
- Services
- Our Projects
- Centering Equity and Inclusion in an Engagement Framework
- Framework for Diabetes in Canada
- COVID-19 and Public Health: The Faith and Spiritual Leaders Dialogue Series
- Burnaby Business Recovery Task Force
- CleanBC Job Readiness Workshops
- Your Voice. Your Home.
- Perspectives on Reconciliation
- Establishing a Chinese-Canadian Museum
- Citizen Dialogues on Canada’s Energy Future
- Clients and Partners
- Get in Touch
- Knowledge & Practice
- Beyond Inclusion
- Dialogue & Engagement Resources
- Dialogue Dispatch Newsletter
- International Climate Engagement Network (ICEN)
- Strengthening Canadian Democracy
- Talk Dialogue to Me Podcast
- Initiatives
- Signature Events
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Award Recipients
- 2024/25: Bringing Justice Home with Judge Abby Abinanti
- 2021/22: Reimagining Social Justice and Racial Equity with adrienne maree brown
- 2019/20: Climate Change and Human Rights with Sheila Watt-Cloutier
- 2017/18: Peace, Pluralism and Gender Equality with Alice Wairimu Nderitu
- 2015/16: Climate Solutions with Tim Flannery
- 2013/14: Reconciliation with Chief Robert Joseph
- 2011/12: Twelve Days of Compassion with Karen Armstrong
- 2009/10: Widening the Circle with Liz Lerman
- 2005: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Right to Health with Mary Robinson
- 2002: Environmental Sustainability with Maurice Strong
- Nomination Details
- History of the Award
- Award Recipients
- Bruce & Lis Welch Community Dialogue
- 2024: AI: Beyond the Hype—Shaping the Future Together with Stephanie Dick and Daniel Barcay
- 2022: Facing the Flames: New and Old Ways of Co-Existing with Fire with Joe Gilchrist and Paul Hessburg
- 2021: All My Relations: Trauma-Informed Engagement with Karine Duhamel
- 2019: Power of Empathy with Kimberly Jackson Davidson
- 2019: Rethinking BC Referendums with John Gastil
- 2017: Strengthening Democratic Engagement with Valerie Lemmie
- 2015-16: THRIVE! Surrey in 2030
- 2014: Citizen Engagement and Political Civility with Dr. Carolyn J. Lukensmeyer
- 2013: Building a Culture of Participation with Dave Meslin
- 2012: Riots and Restorative Justice with Dr. Theo Gavrielides
- 2011: Growing Out of Hunger with Will Allen
- 2010: The Age of Unequals with Richard Wilkinson
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Consulting Services
- Shared Learning
- News
- Give
Takeaways from the Faculty Dialogue on Reconciliation and Decolonization with Siila Watt-Cloutier
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020, the SFU Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue hosted 20 Indigenous scholars and allies on SFU Burnaby campus for a dialogue on reconciliation and decolonization. This dialogue was part of the SFU Centre for Dialogue’s programming for the 2019/2020 Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue and was held in collaboration with the SFU Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
Three dialogue questions
The dialogue focused on three questions, with discussion themes for each summarized below.
1. WHAT ARE THREE ADJECTIVES YOU WOULD USE TO "NAME THE MOMENT WE ARE IN" IN REFERENCE TO DECOLONIZATION AND RECONCILIATION?
Forward-looking
- Hopeful
- Unlearning, learning
- Deep listening
- Pre-future (of history)
- Fledgling
- Cultural revitalization
- Alliance
- Turning point
- Incremental
Intention/Action
- Disruptive
- Our ancestors’ vision
- Steadfast
- Determined
- Resolute
- Breakthroughs
- Resistance
Turbulence/Difficulty
- Disingenuous
- Fragile
- Painful
- Turbulent
- Ignorance
2. WHERE AND HOW ARE WE AS SCHOLARS AND PRACTITIONERS WITHIN THE SFU COMMUNITY MOST EFFECTIVELY POSITIONED TO INTERVENE IN THESE CONVERSATIONS?
A prominent theme that emerged from this discussion was allyship. In order to have meaningful conversations about decolonization and reconciliation, non-Indigenous allies must be conscious of their positionality and power within different systems. As an institution committed to decolonization, we must put Indigenous scholars and practitioners at the forefront of this work and follow their leadership. A critical part of decolonizing is working in relationship with one another, recognizing our positionalities, and supporting the leadership of those with lived experience.
Being committed to this work is emotionally demanding and can feel isolating at times. Participants highlighted that another significant theme was self-care. In order to sustain the work toward social justice and reconciliation, we must take care of our minds, bodies, and spirits. An essential part of self-care is also recognizing one’s own boundaries and honouring one’s own capacity. One participant shared: “You can work on saving your culture or fighting the system, but you can’t do both. We’re not that superhuman.” This comment resonated with many and illuminated how we must bring our gifts to this work in the way we can while honouring our limits.
3. WHAT SUPPORTS DO WE NEED TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE IN A HEART HEALTHY WAY?
A key theme that emerged from this dialogue is that institutional support is key for decolonization. This dialogue discussed how SFU must continue to commit resources and time dedicated to supporting Indigenous leadership and Indigenous led initiatives. Several participants also highlighted the fact that dialogues like these were necessary and essential spaces for healing conversations. Creating safe spaces for dialogue not only allows us to deepen relationships with one another, but to reimagine our roles within the institution for systemic change. In sum, institutional support that fosters relationship building and safe spaces is a key part of supporting Indigenous peoples and allies to survive and thrive in a heart healthy way.
CLOSING REFLECTIONS
In closing, Siila offered her reflections on the sentiments shared throughout the discussions. She affirmed the importance of taking care of ourselves in this work. To conclude the session, participants went in a roundtable and shared their final reflections – many participants shared words of appreciation for each other to be in a safe space with colleagues and allies in this important work.