- About
- People
- What We Do
- Consulting Services
- Services
- Our Projects
- Centering Equity and Inclusion in an Engagement Framework
- Framework for Diabetes in Canada
- COVID-19 and Public Health: The Faith and Spiritual Leaders Dialogue Series
- Burnaby Business Recovery Task Force
- CleanBC Job Readiness Workshops
- Your Voice. Your Home.
- Perspectives on Reconciliation
- Establishing a Chinese-Canadian Museum
- Citizen Dialogues on Canada’s Energy Future
- Clients and Partners
- Get in Touch
- Knowledge & Practice
- Beyond Inclusion
- Dialogue & Engagement Resources
- Dialogue Dispatch Newsletter
- International Climate Engagement Network (ICEN)
- Strengthening Canadian Democracy
- Talk Dialogue to Me Podcast
- Initiatives
- Signature Events
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Award Recipients
- 2024/25: Bringing Justice Home with Judge Abby Abinanti
- 2021/22: Reimagining Social Justice and Racial Equity with adrienne maree brown
- 2019/20: Climate Change and Human Rights with Sheila Watt-Cloutier
- 2017/18: Peace, Pluralism and Gender Equality with Alice Wairimu Nderitu
- 2015/16: Climate Solutions with Tim Flannery
- 2013/14: Reconciliation with Chief Robert Joseph
- 2011/12: Twelve Days of Compassion with Karen Armstrong
- 2009/10: Widening the Circle with Liz Lerman
- 2005: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Right to Health with Mary Robinson
- 2002: Environmental Sustainability with Maurice Strong
- Nomination Details
- History of the Award
- Award Recipients
- Bruce & Lis Welch Community Dialogue
- 2024: AI: Beyond the Hype—Shaping the Future Together with Stephanie Dick and Daniel Barcay
- 2022: Facing the Flames: New and Old Ways of Co-Existing with Fire with Joe Gilchrist and Paul Hessburg
- 2021: All My Relations: Trauma-Informed Engagement with Karine Duhamel
- 2019: Power of Empathy with Kimberly Jackson Davidson
- 2019: Rethinking BC Referendums with John Gastil
- 2017: Strengthening Democratic Engagement with Valerie Lemmie
- 2015-16: THRIVE! Surrey in 2030
- 2014: Citizen Engagement and Political Civility with Dr. Carolyn J. Lukensmeyer
- 2013: Building a Culture of Participation with Dave Meslin
- 2012: Riots and Restorative Justice with Dr. Theo Gavrielides
- 2011: Growing Out of Hunger with Will Allen
- 2010: The Age of Unequals with Richard Wilkinson
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Consulting Services
- Shared Learning
- News
- Give
Engaging Canadians to Inform a National Diabetes Framework
In June 2021, the House of Commons unanimously passed bill C-237 into law as the National Framework for Diabetes Act. The process outlined in the act required the Minister of Health to consult with relevant stakeholders on the design of a national framework and to report back to Parliament within one year.
Following the fall 2021 federal election, the Public Health Agency of Canada reached out to the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue for support in conducting public engagement for the diabetes framework. In a happy coincidence, Centre Fellow Dr. Diane Finegood has spent much of her career studying diabetes or working in relevant policy and research domains.
With the support of the Centre, Diane and Lee Johnston took the lead in speaking to Canadians whose work and lives are affected by diabetes. The timeline was short given the delays imposed by the federal election so the engagement process included key informant interviews (Phase One) which provided the basis for two online public dialogues (Phase Two).
Phase One: Interviews
Phase One of the engagement process featured 32 key informant interviews with over 50 individuals. The conversations covered a considerable breadth of experience relevant to diabetes, including perspectives from people with lived experience of diabetes, health care workers, advocates, private sector representatives and researchers, among others.
This phase of the engagement process was intended to help the Public Health Agency of Canada better understand stakeholder priorities, and to inform the design of subsequent dialogue sessions. A full account of this content can be found here.
Phase Two: Dialogues
Phase Two consisted of two open invitation dialogues – one in English and one in French. 84 people took part in the dialogue sessions, which incorporated large and small group discussions. Participants engaged in conversations about inequity, the experience of living with diabetes, issues related to in research and surveillance, and other topics central to addressing diabetes in Canada.
To expand the reach of these efforts, the dialogue discussion guide was also mounted on the Ethelo online survey platform and Canadians were invited to give their input. Over 900 Canadians responded by indicating their preferences and providing an additional 4,850 comments. The results were summarized here.
The results from all stages of the engagement process were also summarized in the Stakeholder Engagement Report, written by Dr. Finegood and Dr. Johnston and published by the Public Health Agency Canada. Key storylines that emerged from our dialogue with the public centered around:
- The roles that structural inequities play in making preventive and treatment options inaccessible
- The importance of differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes and tailoring responses to the unique needs they present
- The importance to move away from approaches that shame and blame people living with diabetes to ones that support them across all stages and phases of their condition
- The urgent need for accessible and appropriate health care for people living with diabetes
The input collected throughout this engagement process directly informed the development of the Framework for Diabetes in Canada. The Centre’s relationship with the Public Health Agency of Canada is ongoing as Drs. Finegood and Johnston have been enlisted to conduct a new phase of work, this time to help support Canada’s diabetes community engage with the framework itself.
Partner Organization
The Public Health Agency of Canada is part of the federal health portfolio, with the mission to promote and protect the health of Canadians through leadership, partnership, innovation and action in public health. Its activities focus on preventing disease and injuries, responding to public health threats, promoting good physical and mental health, and providing information to support informed decision making.