Suggested Locations for the Placement of Environment Canada's New Hydrometric Stations in the Georgia Basin
Title Page
Introduction
Data
Methodology
Spatial Analysis
Problems & Errors
Conclusion

DATA ACQUISITION AND MANIPULATION - CONTINUED


Hydologic Zones (Rain, Snow, Transition) Coverages

From my ex-supervisor, Paul Whitfield, I received ArcView shapefiles that were made in the years following my co-op term, specifically pertaining to our project. Among these were coverages of the rain, snow and transition hydrologic zones. I used FME to convert these to IDRISI vector format. I changed their reference systems to AlbersBC. I kept these as polygons and made raster versions of them as well, using the POLYRAS module. I made appropriate polygon symbol or palette files for all coverages.
 

Streams Coverage

From Environment Canada I received a large dataset on watersheds and drainage which they themselves had simply downloaded from the BC Fisheries website, http://www.bcfisheries.gov.bc.ca/fishinv/basemaps-maps.html. From this large file, I first eliminated coverages that extended outside the Georgia Basin. In ArcView, I converted the coverages of streams to shapefiles. I then used FME to convert these to IDRISI vector format. For these images, I created a streams line symbol file. I then converted each vector image to a raster image using LINERAS. I used CONCAT to concatenate each of the raster drainage images into one large drainage image. I created a streams palette file. I repeated this process for each major watershed group - Vancouver Island, South Coast and Fraser. I ultimately used CONCAT to create a single raster file of all streams. Figure 12 shows a map of the drainage network for all of the Georgia Basin.

Click here to see the cartographic model of this process.
 

Watersheds Coverage

Using the BC Watershed Atlas, (as above), I selected the theme which identifies watersheds by their stream order. Again, for about 15 coverages, I converted each from ArcView coverage to shapefile, shapefile to IDRISI vector, and from vector to raster (using POLYRAS). However, the raster image for these watersheds identified the pixels by their watershed id number, which was of no use to me. Therefore, I had to ASSIGN pixels by their stream order. This entailed querying the databases in Excel to develop the Attribute Value Files. Once all the raster images had been ASSIGNed, I CONCATenated them into one raster image of stream orders. I repeated this process for each major watershed group. Ultimately, I used CONCAT to create one coverage of watershed stream orders. Figure 13 shows this map.

Click here to see the cartographic model of this process.

Note that only the Fraser group has a watershed, (the Fraser River), of stream order 9. None of the watershed groups have stream orders of 7 or 8.
 
 
 

previous