- Programs
- Undergraduate
- Graduate
- Professional Programs
- Community Economic Development
- Graduate professional programs
- Events
- Learning from the Global Pandemic
- Women Bending the Curve on Climate Change
- Engaging the Community to Build Flood Resilience: 12,000 Rain Gardens for the Puget Sound
- Engaging the university community in realizing sustainabiity: a transformational approach
- Engaging Citizens in Bike Lane Proposals: A Toronto Experience
- Climate Narratives
- Students
- Research
- Giving
- About
- Events
- News
- REDIRECT ONLY
- Sea, Land and Sky Initiative
Violate Bail Conditions or Risk an Overdose? A Legal Conundrum for the Marginalized
What happens when a person who uses drugs is released on bail conditions that include a no-go zone such as the Downtown Eastside? The no-go zone is intended to keep the user away from an area associated with an alleged charge but also prevents access to Insite, a safe-injection site with an aim to prevent overdoses, leaving a person to choose between violating bail or risking their life. A study by Nick Blomley, a Professor in Geography and others, found these types of challenges are quite common. In fact, the study found that 53% of bail orders issued for drug offences in Vancouver over a seven-year period included a no-go or “red” zone. Blomley observes that in Vancouver these “red-zones often equate to a denial of social services which becomes problematic for people who are already very vulnerable.” The study also demonstrated that a revolving door is created when a person is arrested and released on bail.