STAT 330 Lecture 18
Reading for Today's Lecture: 9.5, 10.1.
Goals of Today's Lecture:
Today's notes
We will test the hypothesis in 2 independent
samples
,
using a variance ratio
and get P-values from .
Example: for Michelson data n=m=20 and
In F tables we find
and
so that P < 0.01 for a one sided test. In fact, using SPlus I get P=0.003 one-sided and P=0.006 for a two sided test. Conclusion: The SD of the measurement error has clearly changed from the first 20 to the last 20 measurements.
Next topic: Use same style of test to test
for I>2. This is the so-called ``I sample problem''.
More than 2 samples
Data:
Jargon: ``I levels of some factor influencing the response variable X.''
The idea is that s are results for treatment 1, etc.
Note: in book which is generally a good design.
Model:
Problems of interest:
We do (2) first:
Technique: ANalysis Of VAriance or ANOVA.
Idea: Compare two independent estimates of using an F test.
The theory:
1: In each sample we have an estimate
where is notation for the average of the
sample:
We pool these estimates to get the Mean Square for Error or MSE
where is the total number of observations in all the samples
and
I is the number of samples.
2: The other ``estimate of '' is valid only if
is true.
If
and all the
then
are an iid sample of size I
from
a population which has a
distribution. The
sample
variance of the
is
where now
This sample variance is an estimate of the population variance and
can be used to estimate
by multiplying by n.
Our tests of the hypothesis of no difference between the means to
will be based on the ratio of these two estimates of
. The
crucial factor is that the second estimate of
was derived by
adding the assumption that the null hypothesis is TRUE so that all the
are sampled from the SAME population. One other point is that the restriction
that all the sample sizes be equal is not needed, though the second variance
estimate then becomes more complicated.