Index
Page
Background
Methodology
Data Collection
Data Manipulation
Spatial Analysis and Result
Problems
Analysis:
Criteria 1
Criteria 2 & 3
Criteria 4
Criteria 4: Social Indicator
Closely related
to the school and park buffer zone, is population of young children and
teenagers. As show in the map, the red area are having both low young
children and teenagers. Some red areas are evitable with the result,
for example New Westminster is a retiring city, I am not supprising to
see it is under the third criteria. One of the concentrated red zone
is in downtown, the eastside and the Boardway commercial area.
There is another supporting reference, the education
level. Finding where the high concentrated low education area would
indicate a high possible of more homeless but as I mentioned before,
low education people not necessary a homelessness, but homelessness are
usually in low education level. As shown in the map, the downtown
eastside area is again in this category.
Result
When combining all the criteria, two indicators have
to be come first: income level and population of young children and
teenagers. Although downtown eastside area is not the worse in low
income and unemployment analysis but it is still in the second category
and it fulfill the low population of young children and teenagers.
The other two priorities criteria are the proximity from school, parks,
commercial and public transit. In this part, downtown eastside cannot
pass the criteria of proximity from school, parks and commercial but it
has penty access to public transit. The last two supporting factors
of average rental fee and education level is supprising match with the
presumed result. The following map show the Idrisi generated suitable
location for homeless shelter. Other than downtown eastside, it also
shows several locations such as southern part of Vancouver, Burnaby, New
Westminster and even a small area in North Vancouver. However all
these location are too remote and without support from the community.