|
Home >> Publications >> World Congress Final Reports >> Longevity and Healthy Aging Publications: World CongressLongevity and Healthy
Aging: Evidence and Action Report
submitted by: Report
Author: A
total of 4,086 people, from 75 countries attended the International
Association of Gerontology’s 17th World Congress of
Gerontology, held in Vancouver, July 1-6, 2001. A substantial proportion
of these people were present, on July 5, 2001,from 8:30-10:00 am, when as
part of the Congress, a special plenary session, supported by a grant from
the Health Canada Population Health Fund was held on the topic “Longevity and Healthy Aging: Evidence and Action”. Chaired by
Simon Fraser University professor Dr. Andrew Wister, the chair of the
Congress’s Scientific Program Committee, the session featured three
internationally acclaimed gerontologists:
from New York, Robert
Butler, MD, first director of the U.S. National Institute on Aging and
currently President and CEO of the International Longevity Centre; from
Berlin, Germany, Paul Baltes, PhD,
Director, Centre of Life Span Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human
Development; and from Geneva, Switzerland, Alexandre
Kalache, MD, PhD, Head of the World Health Organization’s Ageing and
Life Course Programme. The fourth distinguished speaker, Robert McMurtry, MD, Assistant Deputy Minister, Population and
Public Health Branch, Health Canada addressed the topic from a Canadian
perspective. This
report summarizes the four presentations, in the process highlighting
“lessons learned” and “best practices” as well as gaps in policy,
practice and information. Healthy
Aging as a Global Investment
Dr.
Robert Butler opened the session by pointing out that healthy aging is
both an individual matter and a public health issue. At the individual
level, it is a dividend of a lifetime commitment to healthy behaviour and
access to education. At the population level it is a significant generator
of wealth. In support of the latter he cited research (Bloom &
Canning, 2000) showing substantial increases in GDP in societies that had
a five-year advantage in life expectancy. He
noted, however, that in spite of the known relationship between health and
wealth, investment in research on healthy aging and in particular, on the
basic biology of aging, is minimal. He
argued for increased funding for such research pointing out that it could
“help stave off the increasing vulnerability to disease and death that
follows the aging of the organism”.
As well, he argued for support of research that would increase our
understanding of the socio-economic, moral, cultural and personal
consequences of the new longevity and population aging. Advancing
programs for the training of health personnel to more effectively assess,
diagnose, care for, and treat older people was a second key target area
for investment, according to Butler, if we are serious about achieving
healthy population aging. A
third objective should be the creation of healthy intervention communities
“as counterparts to the Framingham type of discovery community that
brought us the coronary risk profile”. He noted that the Millennium Communities Project that his
organization is participating in would focus on diet and exercise. In
particular, encouraging smaller portions of food, reduced saturated fat,
and exercise via inexpensive walking clubs (The Partnership to Promote
Healthy Eating and Active Living, Inc. undated). Banking
Health
Articulating
a theme that would be elaborated on by Dr. Kalache, Butler underscored the
importance of taking a life course approach to individual and population
health. He pointed out that many of the diseases of old age are disorders
that begin earlier in life. As an example, he noted that young Americans killed in the
Korean War had pathological evidence of atherosclerosis. Good health
habits in youth are very important in preventing disability in old age.
Bone density, for example, is known to be most effectively established
during puberty and adolescence. Butler
expressed discouragement at the number of overweight persons in the United
States, especially children -- 20% of whom are obese. This, in turn, has
lead to an increased incidence of Type II diabetes in children, striking
some as young as 10 years of age. Fostering
the Health and Wealth of Nations
Butler
stated that it was a matter of enlightened self-interest for rich and
powerful nations to improve the health and educational status of the
developing world. “Effective globalization and a global economy require
healthy and productive consumers. Exporting nations…cannot succeed if
there are no consumers who have the means to buy their products and
services”. Currently, 10 percent of the lifetimes of people living in
the developing world are lost to disease and disability. Nations whose
citizens have impaired and shortened lives cannot be fully productive. Another
reason for reaching out and assisting the developing world is to protect
against the potential dissemination of disease (e.g. AIDS, tuberculosis)
via modern transportation. Suggested
strategies for development included:
Qualified
Optimism
Professor
Baltes began his comments by agreeing with Dr. Butler that the economics
of a society are extremely critical for healthy aging. He also agreed that
it was important to take a life course approach, stating that “the best
guarantee for the future of an aging society are healthy children, healthy
youth and healthy adults”. He then went on to caution the audience about
generalizing optimistic findings based on samples of young-old individuals
to the situation of the very old – i.e. persons aged 85 and over. Citing
findings from the Berlin Aging Study (Mayer & Baltes, 1996; Baltes
& Mayer, 1999), a longitudinal study of men and women aged 70-100,
which began in 1990, he argued for the existence of a “fourth age”,
characterized by a non-reversible negative patterns of change. Speaking
about “cognitive psychological mortality”, he noted that in the fourth
age the behaviour system is challenged to such a degree that none of the
typical interventions will work; learning potential is severely
restricted; multiple dysfunctions are apparent and much of the
individual’s cognitive resources are required just to manage his/her
body. In
order to place his remarks in context it is necessary to revisit his 1996
American Psychological Association Award Address “On
the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny” (Baltes, 1997). In
this landmark paper, which draws on both evolutionary and ontogenetic
perspectives, he identifies three general functions or outcomes of
development (a) growth, (b) maintenance, including recovery (resilience),
and (c) regulation of loss. Over the life span, he argues, there is a
systematic shift in allocation of resources of these three functions such
that in childhood the emphasis is on growth, in adulthood on maintenance
and recovery while in old age more and more are directed towards
regulation or management of loss. The paper also refers to the meta-theory
of Selective Optimization with Compensation (Baltes & Baltes, 1990),
which describes strategies people use to regulate loss. In
his World Congress of Gerontology talk Dr. Baltes illustrated this theory
with the following examples. Example
1: When, at the age of 80, the pianist Arthur Rubenstein was asked in a
television interview how he was still able to play so well, he said “I
play fewer pieces” (the selection part of the process)
“I practice them more often”
(the optimization part) “and I also produce sharper contrast
between fast and slow movements to cover up my loss in mechanical speed”
(compensation).” Example
2: A retired university professor purchases a farm and works it for a
number of years. When it gets to be too much for him, he works only in the
garden and as he loses sensory and motor function moves more and more into
the house until towards the end of his life, his every day purpose in life
was taking care of a window box. Psychology,
according to Dr. Baltes, is a powerful protector against the biological
losses of aging. Our internal
mental reorganizations are extremely powerful in maintaining well-being.
As illustrated in the story of the window box, in old age, by reducing the
territory one can still nurture the territory. But with increasing age
people have fewer and fewer resources to engage in optimization and
compensation. Data from the Berlin Aging Study, illustrated in a number of
slides shown during the plenary session as well as in papers presented
elsewhere in the Congress program (e.g. Jopp & Smith, 2001; Smith,
2001a; Smith 2001b), indicate that overall, beginning at about the age of
85, there is a clear, strong and non-reversible change pattern that is
largely related to the biological life course. While culture – which in
Baltes’ lexicon includes education as well as “crystallized cognitive
pragmatics” i.e. the software of the mind – enhances function of
people with greater amounts of it in the third age, “culture runs
against a wall in the fourth age”. Baltes
stated that while like most of us, he would like the fourth age be a
continuation of what we have seen in the third age, he does not think
there is any evidence of compression of morbidity so far.
He also has serious doubts that genetic intervention will be able
to control the aging process. Noting
that even on one’s deathbed one is expected to learn and to be
generative he stated, “The biology of the human organism, its incomplete
architecture, doesn’t make that possible.”
Data from the Berlin Aging Study, for example, from studies of
walking and talking at the same time, show that with aging more and more
of our resources go into coordination of the body. “It’s like having a
mortgage that we have to pay on continuously. Even if cognitive resources
would stay at the same level, which they do not, one has less and less
available for free ranging activity and to be invested into further
development”. In
concluding his remarks, however, he ended on an optimistic note with the
following joke. John and Mary come to heaven and speak to Saint Peter.
After some chit-chat with John who had been a successful real estate
salesman, Saint Peter says “OK, now I’m going to show you where you
are going to live” and pointed out a wonderful bungalow next to a golf
course and swimming pool and putting green.
John turned to Mary and said “You know, we could have had this
much earlier if it weren’t for your vitamin pills every morning.” Contrasts:
Aging in the Northern and in the Southern Hemispheres
The
third speaker, Dr. Alexandre Kalache, began his presentation with a series
of slides and commentary documenting the life history of a woman born in
Sao Paulo Brazil in 1900 who is now aged 100. He used her life history to
describe a number of public health achievements and developments in health
care that have taken place over the last 100 years – such as the
conquest of diphtheria and other infectious diseases through vaccination,
the prevention of premature death from pneumonia through the use of
antibiotics, improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, and
development of pacemakers and other technologies that enable people with
heart disease to live into old age. He noted, however, that she was one of
the lucky ones. Only 10% of babies born in 1900 in Brazil reached even the
age of 60. Part of her good fortune was that she was born into an affluent
family and thus, was able to access new health treatments and technologies
as they were being developed. Dr.
Kalache went on to point out that much of the much heralded increase that
will take place worldwide in the older population between now and 2050,
will take place in the southern hemisphere.
“However”, he stated emphatically,
“while the developed countries of the north got rich before they
got old, the developing countries of the south are becoming old before
they become rich”. Reminding us that those who will be old in 2050 are
aged between 15 and 25 now, he asked, “How are they living now?”
The contrast between north and south was dramatically illustrated
by comparing the per capita income –currently $30,000-$40,000 in
Switzerland and Japan -- with a few hundred dollars per year in Nigeria
and Egypt. Other areas of
difference included rapid social changes in the south caused by
urbanization, modernization, wars and natural disasters and, in Africa
especially, by the AIDS epidemic. Kalache
noted that a culture of aging is a culture of solidarity – between
generations, between rich and poor, and very importantly between the north
and the south. Another message was that aging belongs to the development
agenda. As articulated in the Brasilia Declaration (see Gutman, 1997)
aging is a development issue; an elderly person is a resource for the
family, the community and the economy. Another important message related
to the life course perspective, which he considered essential for us to
understand the ageing process. Emphasis on prevention of non-communicable
disease and on health promotion was another key theme. While in 1990,
non-communicable disease accounted for 27% of the global burden of
disease, Kalache noted that the figure will jump to 43% by 2020. In
his concluding remarks, Dr. Kalache thanked Health Canada for their
support of the WHO Ageing and Life Course Programme and drew attention to
a new publication that they had jointly produced that was to be launched
that afternoon. Entitled Health
and ageing: a discussion paper (WHO, 2001) this document formed the
basis for Active ageing: A policy framework (WHO, 2002) which was the WHO
Ageing and Life Course Programme’s contribution to the Second United
Nations World Assembly on Ageing. The
final speaker, Dr. Robert McMurtry, began his comments by pointing out
that Canada has much to celebrate with respect to population aging. For
example, life expectancy at 65 stands at an all time high: 16 years for
men and 20 years for women. The latest National Population Health Survey
shows a decrease in activity limitations among 65-74 year olds, there has
been a decline in the proportion of people aged 75 and over who live in
long term care institutions and almost 80% of Canadian seniors rate the
health as good, very good or excellent. Following
a video clip of celebrated Canadian jazz pianist Oscar Peterson, recorded
on his 75th birthday, Dr. McMurtry addressed the question of
“What is Healthy Aging?” defining it as a “lifelong process of
maximizing opportunities for physical, social and mental well-being”. He
then underscored the importance of taking a “determinants of health”
approach to achieving healthy aging.
This approach [1]
recognizes that while access to quality health care is important, 11 other
factors including gender, culture and one’s biological and genetic
endowment can have a profound effect on how we age.
Among these, lifestyle has been the target of a number of health
promotion programs and tools supported by Health Canada.
Canada’s physical activity
guide to healthy active living for older adults is a tool that Dr.
McMurtry drew specific attention to. [2] He
also reviewed a number of key Canadian documents that underpin the ideas
and the policy framework outlined in the WHO publication, which Dr.
Kalache had referred to. These included:
He
noted “The Canadian approach to aging policy has reflected this
history”, and that our National
Framework on Aging (Minister of Public Works and Government of Canada,
1998) is based on the principles of independence, participation, fairness,
dignity, and security – “Canada’s adaptation of the United Nations
Principles on the human rights of older people. The
role and functions of the National Advisory Council on Aging was then
described. Dr. McMurtry said that he was especially pleased that the
Institute of Healthy Aging was named as one of the 13 founding institutes
in the Canadian Institute of Health Research. He said that as Deputy
Minister of Health he will ensure that research knowledge that emerges
from its programs “is translated into sound policies and effective
programs and practices that support healthy aging for Canadians”. He
also recognized an obligation for Canada and other developed nations to
assist developing countries in meeting the challenges of population aging
through provision of money, technical assistance, knowledge transfer,
support of international voluntary sector initiatives and the sharing of
ideas. He
concluded his remarks, and the session, with a video and commentary about
Canada Geese flying in formation, symbolic of the value added by
collaboration across and between provincial, national and international
boundaries and borders as we attempt to achieve healthy aging worldwide. Acknowledgement
The
strong and prolonged applause of the audience testified to their
appreciation of this outstanding session. The 2001 World Congress of
Gerontology Society, the corporate entity charged by the International
Association of Gerontology with responsibility for organizing the
Congress, and the Canadian Association of Gerontology as the host society,
express their thanks to the speakers for sharing their experience and
wisdom and to the Health Canada Population Health Fund for providing
financial support for the session. Appendix
References
Baltes,
P.B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection,
optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American
Psychologist, 52 (4), 366-380. Baltes,
P.B. & Baltes, M.M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful
aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P.B.
Baltes and M.M. Baltes (Eds.) Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp.
1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press. Baltes,
P. B. & Mayer, K. U. (Eds.) (1999). The
Berlin aging study: aging from 70 to 100. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Bloom,
D.E., & Canning, D. (2000). The health and wealth of nations. Science,
287, 5476, 1207-1209. Epp,
J. (1986). Achieving Health for All:
A Framework for Health Promotion. Gutman,
G. M. (1997). Healthy population ageing. World
Health, 4, 20-21. Health
Canada (19__) . Canada’s guide to
healthy active living for older adults Health
Canada. (1994). Strategies for
population health - Investing in the health of Canadians. Ottawa:
Federal, Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population
Health Lalonde,
M. (1974) A new perspective on the
health of Canadians. Mayer,
K. U. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.) (1996). Die
Berliner Alterstudie [The Berlin Aging Study].
Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag. Minister
of Public Works and Government of Canada (1998). Principles of the
National Framework on Aging: A Policy Guide The
Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Living, Inc. (undated). The
Millennium Communities project – Improving the health of Americans, one
community at a time. Boston, MA: The partnership. World
Health Organization (2001). Health and ageing: a
discussion paper. Geneva: WHO Ageing and Life Course Programme. World
Health Organization (2002). Active ageing: a policy framework. Geneva: WHO Ageing and Life
Course Programme. [Copies may be downloaded from http://www.who.int/hpr/ageing Conceptual
Framework Subgroup on Population Health
for the Working Group on Population Health Strategy (1996). Towards
a common understanding: Clarifying the core concepts of population health.
Ottawa: Health Canada Division
of Aging and Seniors ( 1996, Oct.). Broader
determinants of healthy aging: Report of the roundtable held in Ottawa,
Oct.7/8, 1996. Ottawa, Population Health Directorate, Health Canada
[DRAFT]. Division of Aging and Seniors ( 1997, Feb) .The National Framework on Aging. Ottawa: Population Health Directorate, Health Canada [DRAFT] [1] A listing of the 12 key determinants of health recognized by Health Canada can be found on the Health Canada website at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/phdd/docs/common/appendix_c.html [2] The Guide and companion Handbook can be obtained by calling toll free to 1-888-334-9769 of by visiting Canada’s Physical Activity Guide web site at www.paguide.com. The seniors’ guide was developed by the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology and Health Canada, in partnership with the Active Living Coalition for Older Adults, a community-based group representing 26 organizations from across Canada with an interest in healthy aging.
|
|||||