Example 30.9: Analyzing a Doubly-multivariate Repeated Measures Design
This example shows how to analyze a doubly-multivariate repeated
measures design by using PROC GLM with an IDENTITY factor in the
REPEATED statement. Note that this differs from previous releases of
PROC GLM, in which you had to use a MANOVA statement to get a doubly
repeated measures analysis.
Two responses, Y1 and Y2, are each measured three times for each subject
(pretreatment, posttreatment, and in a later follow-up). Each
subject receives one of three treatments; A, B, or the control. In
PROC GLM, you use a REPEATED factor of type IDENTITY to identify the
different responses and another repeated factor to identify the
different measurement times. The repeated measures analysis includes
multivariate tests for time and treatment main effects, as well as
their interactions, across responses.
The following statements produce Output 30.9.1 through Output 30.9.3.
data Trial;
input Treatment $ Repetition PreY1 PostY1 FollowY1
PreY2 PostY2 FollowY2;
datalines;
A 1 3 13 9 0 0 9
A 2 0 14 10 6 6 3
A 3 4 6 17 8 2 6
A 4 7 7 13 7 6 4
A 5 3 12 11 6 12 6
A 6 10 14 8 13 3 8
B 1 9 11 17 8 11 27
B 2 4 16 13 9 3 26
B 3 8 10 9 12 0 18
B 4 5 9 13 3 0 14
B 5 0 15 11 3 0 25
B 6 4 11 14 4 2 9
Control 1 10 12 15 4 3 7
Control 2 2 8 12 8 7 20
Control 3 4 9 10 2 0 10
Control 4 10 8 8 5 8 14
Control 5 11 11 11 1 0 11
Control 6 1 5 15 8 9 10
;
proc glm data=Trial;
class Treatment;
model PreY1 PostY1 FollowY1
PreY2 PostY2 FollowY2 = Treatment / nouni;
repeated Response 2 identity, Time 3;
run;
Output 30.9.1: A Doubly-multivariate Repeated Measures Design
Class Level Information |
Class |
Levels |
Values |
Treatment |
3 |
A B Control |
Number of observations |
18 |
|
The levels of the repeated factors are displayed in Output 30.9.2.
Note that RESPONSE is 1 for all the Y1 measurements and 2 for all
the Y2 measurements, while the three levels of Time identify the
pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up measurements within
each response. The multivariate tests for within-subject effects
are displayed in Output 30.9.3.
Output 30.9.2: Repeated Factor Levels
The GLM Procedure |
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance |
Repeated Measures Level Information |
Dependent Variable |
PreY1 |
PostY1 |
FollowY1 |
PreY2 |
PostY2 |
FollowY2 |
Level of Response |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Level of Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Output 30.9.3: Within-subject Tests
The GLM Procedure |
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance |
Manova Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for the Hypothesis of no Response Effect H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Response E = Error SSCP Matrix S=1 M=0 N=6 |
Statistic |
Value |
F Value |
Num DF |
Den DF |
Pr > F |
Wilks' Lambda |
0.02165587 |
316.24 |
2 |
14 |
<.0001 |
Pillai's Trace |
0.97834413 |
316.24 |
2 |
14 |
<.0001 |
Hotelling-Lawley Trace |
45.17686368 |
316.24 |
2 |
14 |
<.0001 |
Roy's Greatest Root |
45.17686368 |
316.24 |
2 |
14 |
<.0001 |
Manova Test Criteria and F Approximations for the Hypothesis of no Response*Treatment Effect H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Response*Treatment E = Error SSCP Matrix S=2 M=-0.5 N=6 |
Statistic |
Value |
F Value |
Num DF |
Den DF |
Pr > F |
Wilks' Lambda |
0.72215797 |
1.24 |
4 |
28 |
0.3178 |
Pillai's Trace |
0.27937444 |
1.22 |
4 |
30 |
0.3240 |
Hotelling-Lawley Trace |
0.38261660 |
1.31 |
4 |
15.818 |
0.3074 |
Roy's Greatest Root |
0.37698780 |
2.83 |
2 |
15 |
0.0908 |
NOTE: |
F Statistic for Roy's Greatest Root is an upper bound. |
|
NOTE: |
F Statistic for Wilks' Lambda is exact. |
|
Manova Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for the Hypothesis of no Response*Time Effect H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Response*Time E = Error SSCP Matrix S=1 M=1 N=5 |
Statistic |
Value |
F Value |
Num DF |
Den DF |
Pr > F |
Wilks' Lambda |
0.14071380 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Pillai's Trace |
0.85928620 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Hotelling-Lawley Trace |
6.10662362 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Roy's Greatest Root |
6.10662362 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Manova Test Criteria and F Approximations for the Hypothesis of no Response*Time*Treatment Effect H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Response*Time*Treatment E = Error SSCP Matrix S=2 M=0.5 N=5 |
Statistic |
Value |
F Value |
Num DF |
Den DF |
Pr > F |
Wilks' Lambda |
0.22861451 |
3.27 |
8 |
24 |
0.0115 |
Pillai's Trace |
0.96538785 |
3.03 |
8 |
26 |
0.0151 |
Hotelling-Lawley Trace |
2.52557514 |
3.64 |
8 |
15 |
0.0149 |
Roy's Greatest Root |
2.12651905 |
6.91 |
4 |
13 |
0.0033 |
NOTE: |
F Statistic for Roy's Greatest Root is an upper bound. |
|
NOTE: |
F Statistic for Wilks' Lambda is exact. |
|
|
The table for Response*Treatment tests for an overall treatment
effect across the two responses; likewise, the tables for
Response*Time and Response*Treatment*Time test for time and the
treatment-by-time interaction, respectively. In this case, there is a
strong main effect for time and possibly for the interaction, but not
for treatment.
In previous releases (before the IDENTITY transformation was
introduced), in order to perform a doubly repeated measures analysis,
you had to use a MANOVA statement with a customized transformation
matrix M. You might still want to use this approach to see details of
the analysis, such as the univariate ANOVA for each transformed
variate. The following statements demonstrate this approach by using
the MANOVA statement to test for the overall main effect of time and
specifying the SUMMARY option.
proc glm data=Trial;
class Treatment;
model PreY1 PostY1 FollowY1
PreY2 PostY2 FollowY2 = Treatment / nouni;
manova h=intercept m=prey1 - posty1,
prey1 - followy1,
prey2 - posty2,
prey2 - followy2 / summary;
run;
The M matrix used to perform the test for time effects is displayed in
Output 30.9.4, while the results of the multivariate test are given in
Output 30.9.5. Note that the test results are the same as for the
Response*Time effect in Output 30.9.3.
Output 30.9.4: M Matrix to Test for Time Effect (Repeated Measure)
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
M Matrix Describing Transformed Variables |
|
PreY1 |
PostY1 |
FollowY1 |
PreY2 |
PostY2 |
FollowY2 |
MVAR1 |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MVAR2 |
1 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MVAR3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
MVAR4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
-1 |
|
Output 30.9.5: Tests for Time Effect (Repeated Measure)
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
Characteristic Roots and Vectors of: E Inverse * H, where H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Intercept E = Error SSCP Matrix Variables have been transformed by the M Matrix |
Characteristic Root |
Percent |
Characteristic Vector V'EV=1 |
MVAR1 |
MVAR2 |
MVAR3 |
MVAR4 |
6.10662362 |
100.00 |
-0.00157729 |
0.04081620 |
-0.04210209 |
0.03519437 |
0.00000000 |
0.00 |
0.00796367 |
0.00493217 |
0.05185236 |
0.00377940 |
0.00000000 |
0.00 |
-0.03534089 |
-0.01502146 |
-0.00283074 |
0.04259372 |
0.00000000 |
0.00 |
-0.05672137 |
0.04500208 |
0.00000000 |
0.00000000 |
MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for the Hypothesis of No Overall Intercept Effect on the Variables Defined by the M Matrix Transformation H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Intercept E = Error SSCP Matrix S=1 M=1 N=5 |
Statistic |
Value |
F Value |
Num DF |
Den DF |
Pr > F |
Wilks' Lambda |
0.14071380 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Pillai's Trace |
0.85928620 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Hotelling-Lawley Trace |
6.10662362 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
Roy's Greatest Root |
6.10662362 |
18.32 |
4 |
12 |
<.0001 |
|
The SUMMARY option in the MANOVA statement creates an ANOVA table for
each transformed variable as defined by the M matrix. MVAR1 and MVAR2
contrast the pretreatment measurement for Y1 with the posttreatment
and follow-up measurements for Y1, respectively; MVAR3 and MVAR4 are
the same contrasts for Y2.
Output 30.9.6 displays these univariate ANOVA tables and shows that
the contrasts are all strongly significant except for the pre-versus-post
difference for Y2.
Output 30.9.6: Summary Output for the Test for Time Effect
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
Dependent Variable: MVAR1 |
Source |
DF |
Type III SS |
Mean Square |
F Value |
Pr > F |
Intercept |
1 |
512.0000000 |
512.0000000 |
22.65 |
0.0003 |
Error |
15 |
339.0000000 |
22.6000000 |
|
|
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
Dependent Variable: MVAR2 |
Source |
DF |
Type III SS |
Mean Square |
F Value |
Pr > F |
Intercept |
1 |
813.3888889 |
813.3888889 |
32.87 |
<.0001 |
Error |
15 |
371.1666667 |
24.7444444 |
|
|
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
Dependent Variable: MVAR3 |
Source |
DF |
Type III SS |
Mean Square |
F Value |
Pr > F |
Intercept |
1 |
68.0555556 |
68.0555556 |
3.49 |
0.0814 |
Error |
15 |
292.5000000 |
19.5000000 |
|
|
The GLM Procedure |
Multivariate Analysis of Variance |
Dependent Variable: MVAR4 |
Source |
DF |
Type III SS |
Mean Square |
F Value |
Pr > F |
Intercept |
1 |
800.0000000 |
800.0000000 |
26.43 |
0.0001 |
Error |
15 |
454.0000000 |
30.2666667 |
|
|
|
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.