Chapter Contents
Chapter Contents
Previous
Previous
Next
Next
UCHART Statement

Constructing Charts for Nonconformities per Unit (u Charts)

The following notation is used in this section:
uexpected number of nonconformities per unit produced by process
uinumber of nonconformities per unit in the i th subgroup. In general, ui = ci/ni.
citotal number of nonconformities in the i th subgroup
ninumber of inspection units in the i th subgroup
\bar{u}average number of nonconformities per unit taken across subgroups. The quantity \bar{u} is computed as a weighted average:
\bar{u} = \frac{n_{1}u_{1} +  ...  + n_{N}u_{N}}
 {n_{1} +  ...  + n_{N}}
 = \frac{c_{1} +  ...  + c_{N}}
 {n_{1} +  ...  + n_{N}}
Nnumber of subgroups
\chi^2_{\nu}has a central \chi^2 distribution with \nudegrees of freedom

Plotted Points

Each point on a u chart indicates the number of nonconformities per unit (ui) in a subgroup. For example, Figure 41.10 displays three sections of pipeline that are inspected for defective welds (indicated by an X). Each section represents a subgroup composed of a number of inspection units, which are 1000-foot-long sections. The number of units in the i th subgroup is denoted by ni, which is the subgroup sample size.

pipe.gif (4195 bytes)

Figure 41.10: Terminology for c Charts and u Charts

The number of nonconformities in the i th subgroup is denoted by ci. The number of nonconformities per unit in the i th subgroup is denoted by ui=ci/ni. In Figure 41.10, the number of defective welds per unit in the third subgroup is u3=2/2.5=0.8.

A u chart plots the quantity ui for the i th subgroup. A c chart plots the quantity ci for the i th subgroup (see Chapter 33, "CCHART Statement"). An advantage of a u chart is that the value of the central line at the i th subgroup does not depend on ni. This is not the case for a c chart, and consequently, a u chart is often preferred when the number of units ni is not constant across subgroups.

Central Line

On a u chart, the central line indicates an estimate of u, which is computed as \bar{u} by default. If you specify a known value (u0) for u, the central line indicates the value of u0.

Control Limits

You can compute the limits in the following ways:

The lower and upper control limits, LCLU and UCLU, respectively, are given by

{LCLU} & = & {max}(\bar{u} -
 k\sqrt{\bar{u}/n_i} \; ,0 ) \ {UCLU} & = & \bar{u} + k\sqrt{\bar{u}/n_i}

The limits vary with ni.

The upper probability limit UCLU for ui can be determined using the fact that

P\{u_{i} \gt {UCLU}\} & = 1 - P\{u_{i} \leq {UCLU} \} \ & = 1 - P\{c_{i} \leq n_...
 ...\} \ & = 1 - P\{\chi^2_{2(n_{i}(\!{{\scriptsize UCLU}}+1))} \geq 2n_{i}\bar{u}\}

The limit UCLU is then calculated by setting

1 - P\{\chi^2_{2(n_{i}(\!{{\scriptsize UCLU}}+1))} \geq 2n_{i}\bar{u}\} = \alpha/2
and solving for UCLU.

Likewise, the lower probability limit LCLC for ui can be determined using the fact that

P\{u_{i} \lt {LCLC}\} & = P\{c_{i} \lt n_{i}{LCLU} \} \ & = P\{\chi^2_{2(n_i(\!{{\scriptsize LCLC}}+1)} \gt 2n_{i}\bar{u}\}

The limit LCLC is then calculated by setting

P\{\chi^2_{2(n_i(\!{{\scriptsize LCLC}}+1)} \gt 2n_{i}\bar{u}\} = \alpha/2
and solving for LCLC. For more information, refer to Johnson, Kotz, and Kemp (1992). This assumes that the process is in statistical control and that ci has a Poisson distribution. Note that the probability limits vary with ni and are asymmetric around the central line. If a standard value u0 is available for u, replace \bar{u} with u0 in the formulas for the control limits.

You can specify parameters for the limits as follows:


Chapter Contents
Chapter Contents
Previous
Previous
Next
Next
Top
Top

Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.