Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
Nonlinear Optimization Examples |
rc | Reason for Optimization Termination |
1 | ABSTOL criterion satisfied (absolute F convergence) |
2 | ABSFTOL criterion satisfied (absolute F convergence) |
3 | ABSGTOL criterion satisfied (absolute G convergence) |
4 | ABSXTOL criterion satisfied (absolute X convergence) |
5 | FTOL criterion satisfied (relative F convergence) |
6 | GTOL criterion satisfied (relative G convergence) |
7 | XTOL criterion satisfied (relative X convergence) |
8 | FTOL2 criterion satisfied (relative F convergence) |
9 | GTOL2 criterion satisfied (relative G convergence) |
10 | n linear independent constraints are active at xr and none of them could be released to improve the function value |
-1 | objective function cannot be evaluated at starting point |
-2 | derivatives cannot be evaluated at starting point |
-3 | objective function cannot be evaluated during iteration |
-4 | derivatives cannot be evaluated during iteration |
-5 | optimization subroutine cannot improve the function value (this is a very general formulation and is used for various circumstances) |
-6 | there are problems in dealing with linearly dependent active constraints (changing the LCSING value in the par vector can be helpful) |
-7 | optimization process stepped outside the feasible region and the algorithm to return inside the feasible region was not successful (changing the LCEPS value in the par vector can be helpful) |
-8 | either the number of iterations or the number of function calls is larger than the prespecified values in the tc vector (MAXIT and MAXFU) |
-9 | this return code is temporarily not used (it is used in PROC NLP indicating that more CPU than a prespecified value was used) |
-10 | a feasible starting point cannot be computed |
Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
Top |
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.