The result images after the MCE weighted linear analysis.
1. Route 1
This route appear to show the maximum coverage rate. With
the relatively even coverage across the area,
it covers the most of central area and the both side
of the route seems to be within accessibility.
2. Route 2
With the route running up and down the right side of the area, it
gives poor coverage for the west side of the area.
Also, the cost distance value goes up to 2658, which in comparison
with the first image, is relatively high.
3. Route 3
The route on the opposite side of the previous image, this route
allows near-complete coverage for the west side
but heavily neglects the east side this time. The cost value also
goes up to 2612, which is not a satisfactory result.
4. Route 4
The last image was the variation of the first route with more emphasis
on the west side.
Again, the one-sided route gives an excellent coverage but fails
to give much accessibility to the east side of the area.
