Re: Reviewing Spam Appliance Options

To: Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel@wiu.edu>, zimbra-hied-admins <zimbra-hied-admins@sfu.ca>
Subject: Re: Reviewing Spam Appliance Options
From: Rudy Gevaert <Rudy.Gevaert@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:03:38 +0200
In-reply-to: <746583886.2673783.1380734134254.JavaMail.root@wiu.edu>
List-help: <mailto:zimbra-hied-admins-request@sfu.ca?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-id: <zimbra-hied-admins.sfu.ca>
List-owner: <mailto:owner-zimbra-hied-admins@sfu.ca>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zimbra-hied-admins-request@sfu.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <746583886.2673783.1380734134254.JavaMail.root@wiu.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

Have a look at cloudmark. We have been trough home grownamavis-spamasssin-clamav, IronPort and now Cloudmark. We are enteringour fourth year.

We use their spamassassin plugin. It hooks into a their daemon. Theyalso have a milter. But I haven't looked at it. We are using jchkmail.

You still have to setup SA, though, but you don't need to manage it.You can even disable the SA default rules.

References:
- Reviewing Spam Appliance Options
  - From: Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel@wiu.edu>