Re: Zimbra 6.0.9

[Jim Michael <jimm@csufresno.edu>]

Further update.  My staff had noticed the bug that Beth reported and included correcting that issue in last nights maintenance.  So, we are at 6.0.9 with that issue patched.  So far our expereince remains good.

--
James D Michael
Associate Director, Systems
California State University, Fresno - ITS Dept
e-mail: jim_michael@csufresno.edu

Please take a few seconds to help me, and my team, improve!
https://rypple.com/jimm/HowAreWeDoing

“To love someone deeply gives you strength. Being loved by someone deeply gives you courage.” - Lao-Tzu

----- Original Message -----
> We just upgraded from 6.0.7 to 6.0.9 last night. So far so good. We
> will look at the reported issue in our environment. Thanks for sharing
> this, Beth.
> 
> --
> James D Michael
> Associate Director, Systems
> California State University, Fresno - ITS Dept
> e-mail: jim_michael@csufresno.edu
> 
> Please take a few seconds to help me, and my team, improve!
> https://rypple.com/jimm/HowAreWeDoing
> 
> “To love someone deeply gives you strength. Being loved by someone
> deeply gives you courage.” - Lao-Tzu
> 
> ----- Beth Halsema <bhalsema@purdue.edu> wrote:
> >
> > We are seeing this behavior in our test environment as well. I found
> > the
> > following Zimbra bug report:
> >
> > 	http://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53584
> >
> > Beth
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Beth A. Halsema email:bhalsema@purdue.edu
> > ITaP Mailhub Systems Administrator
> > OVPIT - IT Systems & Operations
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Matt Mencel wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:01:34 -0600 (CST)
> > > To: zimbra-hied-admins <zimbra-hied-admins@sfu.ca>
> > > From: Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel@wiu.edu>
> > > Subject: Re: Zimbra 6.0.9
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We upgraded this past Friday as well. Everything seems to be fine,
> > > but we did notice one strange issue.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Apparently in our case, the zimbra upgrade script didn't update
> > > some of the logrotate user:group ownerships in
> > > /etc/logrotate.d/zimbra.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > See here...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /var/log/zimbra.log {
> > >
> > > daily
> > >
> > > missingok
> > >
> > > notifempty
> > >
> > > create 0644 USER GROUP
> > >
> > > postrotate
> > >
> > > killall -HUP syslogd 2> /dev/null || true
> > >
> > > su - zimbra -c "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmswatchctl restart" > /dev/null
> > > 2>&1 || true
> > >
> > > endscript
> > >
> > > compress
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /var/log/zimbra-stats.log {
> > >
> > > daily
> > >
> > > missingok
> > >
> > > notifempty
> > >
> > > create 0644 USER GROUP
> > >
> > > postrotate
> > >
> > > killall -HUP syslogd 2> /dev/null || true
> > >
> > > su - zimbra -c "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmlogswatchctl restart" >
> > > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> > >
> > > endscript
> > >
> > > rotate 0
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "USER GROUP" didn't get replaced correctly during the upgrade. It
> > > did this to every one of our servers and we didn't notice it until
> > > our volumes started growing and we realized logs weren't rotating.
> > >
> > >
> > > Matt Mencel
> > > WIU
> > >
> > >