[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: zmdbintegrityreport
- To: zimbra-hied-admins <zimbra-hied-admins@sfu.ca>
- Subject: Re: zmdbintegrityreport
- From: Amos <a.goo0h@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:21:40 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vpNxho8TTivZQJXCNocngsZz5CRV+4O7fHGpShfRey0=; b=p2KFXx0DQ4UI/yNcPc2uWoNFcHQjGYTcwxwaV3tYuklGSMUSeFYNaY345HnMuCdSeU 6a1zRWnS7SmOx+q1dnSoXMVxRteoFQf73Rij2no48Cc/xMMpJnnu5ZD+oE9G1ahBMAqb rLsV6ueQFEKIVydc/kNtMCqh3lj4C9yDbh1NM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VxVY3fmnPd/veGpBaM3goAbixGCszIVlfyxFI32xMbkPJrwrZThoB+CoGCTe3RGaWa 1Rv4tlNG3SKqmd1X+3WK5u7BOEb4gWB3TG/5kgfIfR20uKOYJpKCqGcQJS7OnfEmyr0d k+39mFTGKt1u6o9HTZdZi6z3uPl7q+Wu/iqew=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTimeDbNnox-+Po2PL9GGLES6FQW_TrGokdN9MpeS@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTimeDbNnox-+Po2PL9GGLES6FQW_TrGokdN9MpeS@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm... overlooked this previously.
http://www.zimbra.com/docs/os/latest/administration_guide/C_CronTab%20Jobs.14.3.html#1059012
So what have some of the larger sites on here done?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Amos <a.goo0h@gmail.com> wrote:
> When are folks running zmdbintegrityreport? I realize it's important
> to run, but gosh, server becomes pretty much unusable when it's
> running. Looking at
> http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Performance_Tuning_Guidelines_for_Large_Deployments#MySQL
> I notice our my.cnf is already at those levels, so hesitant to raise
> anything much further. Not sure how much that would help with
> zmdbintegrityreport anyway.
>
> By default zmdbintegrityreport runs Sunday nights, but that tends to
> be a peak time for us. So I tried Saturday night, and now a professor
> complained. I hate to run it while zmbackups are running, but may
> have to. Maybe just during an incremental the contention won't be so
> bad.
>
> Yeah, we need to split things out onto more servers, but doing so
> rather gradually. This is on a Sun B8000 blade with quad, quad core
> AMD chips. Probably could use some more memory.
>
> Memory: Total Used Free Shared Buffers
> Mem: 32942652 32718860 223792 0 1244704
> Swap: 8393848 36180 8357668
>