[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Expected performance of importing mail?
- To: "Steve Hillman" <hillman@sfu.ca>
- Subject: Re: Expected performance of importing mail?
- From: "Freddie Cash" <fjwcash@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:17:31 -0700
- Cc: zimbra-hied-admins <zimbra-hied-admins@sfu.ca>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QALwByCFBr+5Bhm6kdEXR6je4RddTktgCuAkp3CzLvI=; b=lyg0RsQ8BnNlpvTyIzXwFRXGdO0KQjCRza20e3xtTvjA8G+Q0/AWYG8FS+mTH9h9CmyLtDK3a3psZkSvkB1CjBKrmw4us8/ejsNfQCMnkCTyGuZ8H6I23S9yDthHb4sNRf65kCBsDN5krg/yYipE35JZw0KpYXsP97f03IlYTQw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tkCKqXjJKi6zeKMkv0zpAohOPfGmz0tUqkde/N0ae+/oXVuaqvek05tiUbgNih2sxE1IK3mosnsOnz8tmL03Pt9locwp8pxZUYu4/z/jQMJRezwkPOU7+dSEjfzxO8TU4mxyhYelDhf4XwlM+ZpwkEVzfBSHGUkMkWXDWDDwUtw=
- In-reply-to: <2104305210.265381209747779819.JavaMail.root@jaguar7.sfu.ca>
- References: <1092414212.265361209747688874.JavaMail.root@jaguar7.sfu.ca> <2104305210.265381209747779819.JavaMail.root@jaguar7.sfu.ca>
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Steve Hillman <hillman@sfu.ca> wrote:
> ----- "Freddie Cash" <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would have to say there's either something wrong with the SOAP
> > interface, or something wrong with your setup. Using imapsync
> > running
> > on the Zimbra server, we were able to migrate 250+ MB mailboxes in
> > just over an hour. (As this was just a test box, we didn't keep
> > stats
> > on the migration, other than it took a couple hours for really large
> > accounts. The largest was just under 2 GB and took just over 4
> > hours.)
>
> Hmm. If a 250MB mailbox took you about an hour, then you were actually getting worse performance than I am.
Yes, but look at the hardware difference between your setup and mine.
Yours should be several orders of magnitude faster. :) If I can do a
250 MB mailbox in an hour using IDE disks on a RAID5 via a 100 Mbps
connection, you should be able to do a lot more than that. That was
my point. Not the pure numbers.
A 3x improvement from a lot better hardware points to a performance
issue somewhere.
--
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com