The overall goal of this writing-intensive seminar is two-fold:
First, to assist students in gaining a deeper understanding of multi-modal human cognition, perception, and behaviour and embodied, spatial cognition in the context of computer-based media. This knowledge will serve a as the basis for a conducting a small straightforward research project that will be written up for potential publication as outlined below.
Second, to help students improve their scientific thinking, writing, and publishing skills. To this end, each student will design, run, and collect/analyze data from small straightforward quantitative research projects (ideally within the above scope) that uses the “scientific approach” and go through the different steps of how to get from a research idea to a publishable paper (which can ideally be submitted at the end of the seminar, else later). While interactive lectures, reading assignments, and discussions will provide the basic knowledge, the main focus of this seminar will be on hands-on experience with scientific writing, discussion, revision, peer-reviewing/feedback/evaluation, and submission/publication. This will help students to improve their scientific thinking/reasoning, research, and writing skills to ultimately enable them to successfully write for and publish in international conferences and journals.
Details and further information can be found in the course syllabus on the course management system.
I see scientific research and writing as an iterative process of inventing, drafting, and revising, as illustrated in the sketch on the right.
Instructor: Bernhard Riecke: ber1[at]sfu.dot.ca
Wednesday classes: 10:30 - 11:50, in SFU Surrey room 3040
Friday classes: 10:30-12:20, in SFU Surrey room 2980
Visit http://sakai.sfu.ca/, login, then go to "iat812 Spring 2012".
Try the schedule tab for an overview on assignents and deliverables.
SFU First day of class: Thursday Jan. 5th. 2012--> the first IAT812 class will be on Friday 6th January
see also SFU Academic Calendar dates
Reading break: 13.-17. Feb.
April 6: Good Friday. All classes cancelled and offices closed.
Last day of class: Wed. 11. April
Final 5min project presentations: in last colloquium on Wed. April 11
Final papers due: TBD, likely about a week after the last day of class.
This books should also be on the reserve shelf in the library. Supplementary readings will be announced as needed
What, why, so what? Understand course procedures and "big picture"
At the end of this session, you should be able to:
Quick-write: Research idea “Elevator Pitch Minute Paper” & Presentation
Week 1 preparations:
Ongoing:
JiTT feedback & discussion
Go through SFU Library Services for Graduate Students. I expect all to be familiar with the services offered (e.g., conference alerts, lit search engines like Web of Science or EBSCO)
Booth , Colomb, & Williams (2008). The craft of research:
JiTT (Warm-up reading reflection) exercise: submit to sakai/JiTT and bring your answers to class (on laptop/paper):
1. What about this week's reading material did you find most interesting/useful/inspiring/exciting? Why?
2. What specifically would you like to try out yourself and integrate into your skill set? How could/should you approach this to ensure success? How could this course & writing teams help you achieve this goal?
3. Any other observations, ideas, criticism, possible questions/topics for class discussion?
Suggested length: about 1 page total (depends on your style, feel free to add more);
make it useful for yourself (e.g., this could be the essence of what you'd like to remember and re-use in the future! feel free to include mindmaps, sketches etc.)
File naming convention: iat812_week02_JiTT_YourName.pdf or .docx/.doc
Please always add your name, date, and title (e.g., iat812 JiTT week 2) to the document.
General evaluation rubric for JiTT/reading reflection (what I look for & value). See .pdf of grading rubric on sakai / resources for details
Do readings and JiTT assignments (readings are listed in the week they are due, JiTTs are due Tuesday 3pm before that week, see sakai).
Week 2 prep:
Writing assignment 1: Compare & Contrast exercise: - Effective vs. ineffective Abstracts. please submit on sakai / assignments
Understand the basics of Sensation & Perception
Why should we care about sensation & perception? How might it relate to your own interest/research topic?
discussion of reading material & reflections
Feedback/demo on instructor's response to written submissions
Explanation of evaluation rubrics
please at least skim through Craft of research, Part II, chapter 4 - it could help you define & refine your research question/project
1) EvansRooney__MethodsInPsychologicalResearch__TOC_Ch1.pdf: [background paper on scientific method etc., available on sakai / resources / Reading Material]; Exercise on quick skimming and getting gist: spend a few minutes to determine your skimming strategy; then spend <=25min to skim AND summarize main points in your own words to answer the below questions (time yourself!)
Mini-reflection paper (suggestion: 50-200words):
2) Morris & Maisto (2007). Understanding Psychology, Chapter 3: Sensation and Perception [essential overview reading, available on sakai / resources / Reading Material], feel free to skip sections "perception of distance and depth" until "visual illusions"
Reflection paper (suggestion: 50-300 words total):
General evaluation rubric for JiTT/reading reflection (what I look for & value). See .pdf of grading rubric on sakai / resources for details
Do readings and JiTT/Warm-up exercises (readings are listed in the week they are due)
Week 2 follow-up activity:
Make sure you exchange writing team infos and add them to sakai wiki under "teams". Please add/link/email me a team picture
Week 3 prep:
Writing assignment 2: Creating your own writing guidelines
What makes a scientific report effective?
How can we learn to write effective reports?
How to come up with a clear & concise idea for research proposal?
how to ensure it's interesting, relavant, doable, and publisheable?
brief discussion of lit search engines and writing software
discussion of reading material & reflections
team show&tell of revised joint writing guidelines (explain design choices)
Elevator pitch partner exercise: How would your partner pitch your project? (Discussion, revision, then:)
Short presentation of research proposals (WA3 prep) in class ("elevator pitch")
Craft of research, Part II, chapter 4-6: “asking questions, finding answers” (pp. 51-101) & Part III, chapter 7-9: “making a claim and supporting it” (pp. 102-138)
Readings & JiTT (Warm-up reading reflection) exercise: submit to sakai and bring your answers to class (on laptop/paper): With respect to this weeks readings (Craft of research, Part II, chapter 4-6: “asking questions, finding answers” (pp. 51-101) & Part III, chapter 7-9: “making a claim and supporting it” (pp. 102-138)):
1. What about this week's reading material did you find most interesting/useful/inspiring/exciting? Why?
2. What specifically would you like to try out yourself and integrate into your skill set? How could/should you approach this to ensure success? How could this course & writing teams help you achieve this goal? (optional: What could be your action plan?)
3. [optional] Any other observations, ideas, self-reflections, reflection on meta-level, criticism, possible questions for class discussion?
Suggested length: about 1 page total (depends on your style, feel free to add more);
make it useful for yourself (e.g., this could be the essence of what you'd like to remember and re-use in the future! feel free to include mindmaps, sketches etc.; Structure & highlighting typically helps)
File naming convention: iat812_week04_JiTT_YourName.pdf or .docx/.doc
Please always add your name, date, and title (e.g., iat812 JiTT week 4) to the document.
General evaluation rubric for JiTT/reading reflection (what I look for & value). See .pdf of grading rubric on sakai / resources for details
[Optional] Statistics & research methods readings (for those who lack sufficient background or want a refresher):
Do readings and JiTT/Warm-up exercises
Week 3 follow-up activity:
Week 4 prep: Elevator pitch
Feedback from previous course members
Potential discussion/groupwork topics:
Research proposal activity: Peer-reviewing of research proposals (WA3)
Weiten: Research methods concept chart
1) Ware (2008) Visual Thinking for Design, Ch. 1 "visual queries" & Ch. 2 "what we can easily see" [available online through library or on sakai / resources / Reading Materials] [Exercise on quick skimming and getting gist: spend a few minutes to determine your skimming strategy, then <=40min to skim AND summarize main points in your own words (time yourself!) - don't worry if you've read it before, try the exercise anyways]
2) Shepard & Metzler (1971) Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects [short classic paper, available on sakai / resources / Reading Material] [suggestions: time yourself to <20min]
Week 4 follow-up activity:
Week 5 prep:
Storyboarding & Visual Outlining?
Devil's advocate game
Speedwriting
TBD: Research plans activity w/ scientific study journal
TBD: Paper outlining activity: go visual & tangible!
Discussion on experimental design, Instructions, informed consent, designing questionnaire, confounds
discuss informed consent form
Is your research project doable?
JiTT (Warm-up reading reflection) exercise: submit to sakai and bring your answers to class (on laptop/paper):
Goal: get overview of relevant research in your field that can motivate and support your own research topic. Practice skimming of research papers. Include in your paper introduction/discussion [and if you like: annotated bib].
Task:
(a) skimming & selectively reading papers in your field & submit summary
(b) brief reflection on skimming: How did the skimming exercise go? What worked/didn't (and why)? (How) would you change your skimming technique in the future? How could we make this exercise (even more) useful for you?
Week 5 follow-up activity:
Week 6 prep:
Special second session on experimental design with guess statistician Tom Loughin,
Wed. 29. Feb, 11:30 -12:50, in SUR4040 (note: an hour later, and different room!).
Fr. 2nd March: self-organized teamwork / no official class
Things you might want to do in your writing team:
If you're not already confident with statistics & experimental design, read up on it, this was a course pre-requisite! e.g., Evans & Rooney, start w/ chaper 2, then continue with whatever book/resource works best for you.)
Craft of research
Week 6 follow-up activity:
Week 7 prep:
Prepare for sessions on experimental design/statistics with Tom Loughin. Jot down & bring any related questions you might have. His goal is to have an excellent mental image of everything in your experiment that matters to the design/analysis. Questions he'll want to pursue in any consultation include:
1. What is the big picture? (What are you doing to change the world or make it a better place?)
2. Toward that, what specific question(s) are you trying to address
3. How are you going about exploring these questions? How does your study proceed? How do you handle subjects?
4. What are you measuring and how does it address your questions?
5. Why are things doing it this way? Are there any limitations that keep you from doing more? Are you worried about anything?
[the following is optional and for yourself, you don't need to hand anything it, but I think it could be valuable]: Analysis of current state of exp: what worked & didn't work, what needs to change, what help/support do I need, where do I get it...
Learn more about experimental design, and get feedback from Expert
TBD
Special second session on experimental design with guess statistician Tom Loughin,
Wed. 7th March, 11:30 -12:50, in SUR4040 (note: an hour later, and different room!).
Fr. 9th March: normal class, Bernhard back from TEDactive & IEEE VR
Declaration of project work across multiple courses or related to previous work
Discussion: how to run your experiment.
Discussion/ Presentation:
On how to lie because you don't understand statistics: Astin, A. W. (2011, February 14). In 'Academically Adrift,' Data Don't Back Up Sweeping Claim. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Academically-Adrift-a/126371/
Craft of research
JiTT (Warm-up reading reflection) exercise: submit to sakai and bring your answers to class (on laptop/paper): With respect to the last 2 weeks' readings (Craft of research, chapter 10-17 + part V):
1. What about this week's reading material did you find most interesting/useful/inspiring/exciting/(or annoying/wrong/questionnable)? Why?
2. What specifically would you like to try out yourself and integrate into your skill set? How could/should you approach this to ensure success? (optional: What could be your action plan?) How could this course & writing teams help you achieve this goal?
3. Meta-reflection: Please revisit your previous JiTT's on the "craft of research" textbook and what you mentionned you'd like to try out: What did you manage to try out? How did it go? What worked vs. what didn't? Why? What next?
4. How were the experimental design/statistics sessions with Tom Loughin? What was useful? What could be further improved and how?
5.Course Improvement Wishlist: Is there anything we (course, instructor, team, SIAT, SFU...) could do/provide/go over in this course (or beyond) that would help you succeed in your project (design, running, ananlysis, writing up, and revision or paper)? Don't worry if your wish seems unrealistic, it'll still be useful feedback.
Suggested length: about 2-3 pages total (depends on your style, feel free to add more);
make it useful for yourself (e.g., this could be the essence of what you'd like to remember and re-use in the future! feel free to include mindmaps, sketches etc.; Structure & highlighting typically helps)
File naming convention: iat812_week08_JiTT_YourName.pdf or .docx/.doc
Please always add your name, date, and title (e.g., iat812 JiTT week 4) to the document.
General evaluation rubric for JiTT/reading reflection (what I look for & value). See .pdf of grading rubric on sakai / resources for details
Week 7 follow-up activity:
Week 8 prep:
TBD - depends on your interests & needs ;-)
no readings or JiTT
Week 8 follow-up activity:
Week 9 WS/Lecturere prep:
TBD: open access publishing, author's rights (retaining copyright) for faculty / grads, SPARC author addendum...
Which stats to run? Decision trees on sakai / resources / stats
Making sense of numbers - Q&A on data analysis.
What's the purpose of your data plots/presentation? How can you design it so it optimally supports this? I.e., how to design for effective visual queries & thinking? --> Forum, then group discussion
Paper & pencil course evaluations
[optional] recap: IAT 812 grading scheme Course Syllabus
Q&A about running experiments
disussion of paper outlines and final paper process
Team paper critique/modeling Q&A
scheduling of final elevator pitch presentations (Wed. in last Colloq): add title to wiki. Graded: 5%
Week 9 follow-up activity:
Week 10 prep:
Define goal for this exercise
speed-write; (thing "sketching with words")
sketching;
fresh/continue speed-write
extreme writing (paired)?
TBD / No specific reading assignments to give you more time for your project & paper
Week 10 follow-up activity:
Week 11 prep:
scheduling of final research project presentations (Wed. April 11th in Colloq): add title to wiki. Graded: 5%
How to present? What makes a great talk?
How to win the publishing game?
Publishing and being-a-researcher; How to get your study published
Authorship rules
JiTT (Warm-up reading reflection) exercise: submit to sakai and bring your answers to class (on laptop/paper):
1) Short reading on Revision Strategies: Sommers: "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers" available under resources/writingGuidelines. (no related JiTT question for this reading, but it'll be useful for your own writing)
2) Revisit Writing Guidelines: Re-read/skim all the IAT812 team writing guidelines on sakai (under resources / Assignment 2 - Creating your own writing guidelines) and your JiTT responses regarding writing & revision (the ones related to the craft of research readings) before continuing on your manuscript. (Suggestion: print them out and put them up behind your desk so have them always in view when writing. This way, create a dedicated writing space).
JiTT Mini-reflection paper for (2) (50-400words suggested length): In the light of your own manuscript, summarize (or copy&paste, highlight etc.) the advice/suggestions/ideas that seem most important for your paper/project and might improve it the most if you would follow it. Summarize it for this JiTT (bullet-points are fine for the JiTT) and briefly explain your choices (i.e., why is this essential/useful for your paper/project).
Suggestion: print this out and add it to your writing space so you can always see at a glance what's most relevant
Week 11 follow-up activity:
Week 12 prep:
.
What to do if you didn't get the results you expected? What if you realize what you should have done?
Peer-review discussion
Team paper critique/modeling
Peer-reviewing of Writing assignment 6: Final Paper
Discussion: Feedback, what went well, what could be improved & how...
Project presentation practice session [in small teams -> more chance for feedback & discussion?]
Wed 11th April in SIAT research colloquium, SUR5380: short (5 min) Research Project Presentations for all!
Presentation samples, mini-paper & discussion
mini-paper: What would you like to see in 5min presentation of study/data?
as discussed:
Room: Surrey 4010. I reserved the room from 10-12:30. Hopefully we won't need that long, but I wanted to make sure there's sufficient time for all your questions just in case.
--> bring any specific questions you might have regarding peer-reviewing, your own paper etc.
Room: Surrey 2746. I reserved the room from 11-12:00.
--> bring any specific questions you might have regarding your own paper
Short (non-optional) readings on Reviewing: Please carefully read:
No need to submit anything here unless you want bonus credit, just make sure to follow this advice when reviewing your colleagues papers!
Optional JiTT Mini-reflection paper part 1: If you want bonus JiTT credit: Look for >3 more resources on peer reviewing in the sciences, and condense them into your own short reviewing guidelines (similar to the WA2 exercise on writing your own writing guidelines; feel free to use the resources under sakai / resources / ReviewingResources )
Optional JiTT Mini-reflection paper part 2 (for bonus points): Try out a (new-to-you) anti-procrastination / notetaking / self-management technique (e.g., one of the ones presented in class) for a few days and reflect on it in the JiTTs. What technique did you try out? How did it work? What worked/didn't work? Why? What would/could you do in the future to improve things? Any other comments/suggestions...?
Do readings (and optional JiTT/Warm-up exercise)
Week 12 follow-up activity:
Week 13 prep:
(1) Colloquium presentations
(2) Draft of full paper
you should really have collected and analyzed all data by now!
please check the final paper grading rubric under resources/ Assignment
Bring: 1 printout of your paper + list of questions for reviewers
Week 13 follow-up activity (see sakai assignments for details):
.
.
* Writing Assignment 5F: Feedback/reviewing of Title & Abstract * Writing Assignment 6F: Formal Peer-Feedback/Reviewing of paper
Writing assignment 6R (50% of grade): Revision of Final Paper: Rewriting of paper based on feedback & discussion, should be submission-ready (non-blinded)
Scientific Study Journal - FINAL OBLIGATORY SUBMISSION