The report recommends four categories of support and actions: 1. The development of a variety of survivor supports, along with necessary funding; 2. Increased education and awareness among the general public and specific communities; 3. Education, training, and tools within the healthcare system; and 4. Continued research. While all four are important, Archibald and Sullivan point out the intersectional and additional considerations that can be made.
“Awareness of the public and continued research is really important; in this project, we weren’t able to focus on specific populations, since we first sought to understand what is needed by the survivor community at large,” Archibald explains. “But we have identified that there are many intersectional needs specific to different sub-populations, such as BIPOC individuals that have experienced harm, that require further research to properly understand their unique needs.”
“The creation of a multifaith coalition of 2SLGBTQ+ affirming faith-based networks leaders and allies that are strategically created as anti-racist and anti-oppressive would help to act as a conduit to the grassroots advocacy that is already helping the religious communities,” Sullivan explains. “Healthcare practitioners/providers, scientists, and researchers should not assume that all 2SLGBTQ+ people want to leave their religious communities, or abandon religion altogether if they do leave, or that they don’t still carry within them open wounds from religious trauma in addition to SOGIECE related trauma if they do leave religion altogether.”
For those interested in working in the health care or research field, Archibald and Sullivan reiterate the importance of being cognizant of environments and individuals that may differ from your lived experience.
“Be affirming of all sexual and gender minorities – approach work, not from a binary lens, but a neutral lens where there is a spectrum,” Archibald says. “You cannot assume for people, so try your best to make an inclusive, affirming, and welcoming environment.”
“People who experienced CT need support, not judgment or dismissal; they need to hear stories of healing and liberation experienced by survivors of conversion therapy practices, who know the pitfalls and dangers of religious abuse and conversion therapy practices,” Sullivan explains. “We need to be there to affirm the validity of their experience when they start looking for information not provided by their gatekeepers.”
If you are looking for opportunities to help connect with work in this area, or with Reilla’s team or colleagues, you can participate in the UnACoRN Study, or connect with The Roundtable. If you want to connect with Jordan’s work, you can stay tuned to CBRC’s projects.
T I L